Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Trapezoid definition
Replies: 26   Last Post: Oct 7, 2004 11:51 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Mary Krimmel Posts: 629 Registered: 12/3/04
Re: Is a rectangle a square?
Posted: Sep 28, 2004 4:52 PM

At 04:09 PM 9/28/04 -0400, you wrote:
. . .
. . .
>Professor Conway, on the other hand, defines a trapezoid as a
>quadrilateral with "at least" on pair of parallel sides. Using that
>definition, the set of parallelograms is clearly a subset of the set
>of trapezoids. Thus, using that definition, every rectangle is a
>trapezoid, and also a parallelogram (as is the case with the usual
>definition).
>
>A similar problem exists with the definition of the kite. Most
>writers say it is a quadrilateral in which AT MOST one diagonal is the
>perpendicular bisector of the other. Conway would say that it is a
>quadrilateral in which AT LEAST one diagonal is the perpendicular
>bisector of the other. So using Conway's definition, every rhombus is
>a kite.
>
>There have been many, many message threads here on this issue.
>Logically, there is a great deal to be said for Prof. Conway's
>position.

Amen. Most of the other conflicting definitions defy logic.

Mary Krimmel

------- End of Forwarded Message

Date Subject Author
8/7/00 John Benson
8/8/00 John Conway
8/8/00 Floor van Lamoen
8/8/00 John Conway
8/9/00 Floor van Lamoen
8/9/00 mary krimmel
8/9/00 Lee Rudolph
10/17/02 Julio Albornoz
10/18/02 Walter Whiteley
10/18/02 G.E. Ivey
10/28/03 Pamela Paramour
10/28/03 Walter Whiteley
10/28/03 John Conway
10/29/03 Mary Krimmel
10/29/03 John Conway
10/30/03 Rick Nungester
9/28/04 Kit
9/28/04 David W. Cantrell
9/28/04 NealAgMan@nyc.rr.com
9/28/04 Mary Krimmel
10/7/04 Donna W.
10/7/04 Donna W.
10/23/02 Ken.Pledger@vuw.ac.nz
10/25/02 Pat ballew
8/9/00 Jon Marshall
8/9/00 Floor van Lamoen
8/10/00 John Conway