The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Composites, and neat relation
Replies: 18   Last Post: Sep 14, 2004 3:38 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Jim Burns

Posts: 1,200
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Composites, and neat relation
Posted: Sep 12, 2004 3:14 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

James Harris wrote:
> So someone pointed out that there's the trivial relation
> [x] + [x + 1/2] = [2x] where you're in reals,
> and I started thinking about
> [x] + [x + 1/k] = [2x]
> also in reals, with k>1, and it turns out you need x>1 as well,
> which I was thinking about didn't put down before.
> Using that with x = N/2kj,

Whoa, whoa, whoa. How about proving the above before using it?

This would also be a good opportunity to demonstrate your
"null test" idea.

Jim Burns

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.