Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Composites, and neat relation
Replies: 18   Last Post: Sep 14, 2004 3:38 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Jim Burns Posts: 1,200 Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Composites, and neat relation
Posted: Sep 12, 2004 3:14 PM

James Harris wrote:
&gt;
&gt; So someone pointed out that there's the trivial relation
&gt;
&gt; [x] + [x + 1/2] = [2x] where you're in reals,
&gt;
&gt; and I started thinking about
&gt;
&gt; [x] + [x + 1/k] = [2x]
&gt;
&gt; also in reals, with k&gt;1, and it turns out you need x&gt;1 as well,
&gt; which I was thinking about didn't put down before.
&gt;
&gt; Using that with x = N/2kj,

Whoa, whoa, whoa. How about proving the above before using it?

This would also be a good opportunity to demonstrate your
"null test" idea.

Jim Burns

Date Subject Author
9/12/04 JAMES HARRIS
9/12/04 The Last Danish Pastry
9/12/04 Jim Burns
9/12/04 Tim Smith
9/13/04 David C. Ullrich
9/12/04 Nate Smith
9/12/04 C. BOND
9/12/04 Dik T. Winter
9/12/04 Dik T. Winter
9/12/04 JAMES HARRIS
9/13/04 Paul Murray
9/13/04 JAMES HARRIS
9/13/04 C. BOND
9/13/04 Jim Burns
9/14/04 Nate Smith
9/13/04 Dik T. Winter
9/14/04 Paul Murray
9/13/04 Dik T. Winter
9/13/04 David C. Ullrich