Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



Re: Composites, and neat relation
Posted:
Sep 13, 2004 5:58 AM


On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:35:49 GMT, Tim Smith <reply_in_group@mousepotato.com> wrote:
>On 20040912, James Harris <jstevh@msn.com> wrote: >> So someone pointed out that there's the trivial relation >> >> [x] + [x + 1/2] = [2x] where you're in reals, >> >> and I started thinking about >> >> [x] + [x + 1/k] = [2x] >> >> also in reals, with k>1, and it turns out you need x>1 as well, which >> I was thinking about didn't put down before. > >Try x = 50.75, k = 100.
ok, so this means it's true for x > 51, k > 100, right?
nobody's given a counterexample.
************************
David C. Ullrich
sorry about the inelegant formatting  typing onehanded for a few weeks...



