The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Composites, and neat relation
Replies: 18   Last Post: Sep 14, 2004 3:38 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Dik T. Winter

Posts: 7,899
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Composites, and neat relation
Posted: Sep 12, 2004 7:24 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In article <> (James Harris) writes:
> Using that with x = N/2kj, where N, k and j are naturals, and N>=2kj,
> you get
> [(N+2j)/2kj] = [N/kj] - [N/2kj]
> and to test it, I'll use N=13, k=2, j=3, which gives
> [19/12] = [13/6] - [13/12]
> so that works.

Yes, that it works for one set of values *must* mean that it works for all
sets of values... Try k = 6, j = 1, and N any of the values from 18 to 21.

Where is the null test?
dik t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; <a href=""></a>

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.