Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
Composites, and neat relation
Replies:
18
Last Post:
Sep 14, 2004 3:38 AM




Re: Composites, and neat relation
Posted:
Sep 13, 2004 5:56 AM


On 12 Sep 2004 11:43:15 0700, jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) wrote:
>So someone pointed out that there's the trivial relation > >[x] + [x + 1/2] = [2x] where you're in reals, > >and I started thinking about > >[x] + [x + 1/k] = [2x] > >also in reals, with k>1, and it turns out you need x>1 as well, which >I was thinking about didn't put down before.
right. how do you prove that the equation holds for k > 1 and x > 1?
************************
David C. Ullrich
sorry about the inelegant formatting  typing onehanded for a few weeks...



