The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Composites, and neat relation
Replies: 18   Last Post: Sep 14, 2004 3:38 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
David C. Ullrich

Posts: 21,553
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: Composites, and neat relation
Posted: Sep 13, 2004 5:56 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On 12 Sep 2004 11:43:15 -0700, (James Harris) wrote:

>So someone pointed out that there's the trivial relation
>[x] + [x + 1/2] = [2x] where you're in reals,
>and I started thinking about
>[x] + [x + 1/k] = [2x]
>also in reals, with k>1, and it turns out you need x>1 as well, which
>I was thinking about didn't put down before.

right. how do you -prove- that the equation holds for k > 1 and
x > 1?


David C. Ullrich

sorry about the inelegant formatting - typing
one-handed for a few weeks...

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.