Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
Inactive
»
HistoriaMatematica
Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.
Topic:
[HM] Faulty Proofs in the History of Mathematics
Replies:
11
Last Post:
Oct 30, 2004 8:00 AM




Re: [HM] Faulty Proofs in the History of Mathematics
Posted:
Oct 30, 2004 8:00 AM


Chuck Lindsey's story on the origins of analytic set theory is true. Aleksandrov (in Luzin's seminar in 1915) was proving that every uncountable Borel set contains a nonempty perfect subset (so that the continuum hypothesis is true for Borel sets) when he noticed the mistake. Suslin noticed that Aleksandrov's proof actually applied to a larger class of sets than the Borel sets, which he called Asets because they were produced by a transfinite inductive process called the Aoperation. (The A was supposed to be for "analytic", but Aleksandrov said it was for "Aleksandrov".) I mentioned this story in my 1994 article on "Descriptive set theory and uniqueness of trigonometric series" in the Archive for History of Exact Sciences. The basic facts are given in Lebesgue's preface to Luzin's book "Ensembles analytiques".
Roger Cooke



