>hello all..... >i am a first year ap stat teacher and have a few questions that my >kids do also....... > >1. why do we take log of y-values and then transform to exponential > equation? it seems to me that we could just do a exponential > regression and skip all short work.... > (1) The AP syllabus specifies that we teach power and log transformations to achieve linearity. (2) Converting a logy = a+bx equation into exponential form is not really the same as exponential regression, even though the calculator calls it that. (3) Students are not required to make that conversion. They do need to be able to work with the log y equation.
> >2. Same question for power regression, why take log of x's and y's > then convert? why not just do power regression and skip work? > Same answers. And again, don't convert. Kids need to be able to use the logy = a+blogx equation to make numerical estimates.
> >3. Can r-values from different regressions simply be 'compared'? > namely, can we just do a bunch of regressions and then pick the > one with the best r value? > With what objective? First, r applies only to linear regressions. And a high r-value does not mean that the model is appropriate. Only randomness in the residuals can address that issue.
> >4. What is the round-off rule? most of the time i use one more > decimal than what is given in data, this is what my stat book for > college does, is this standard? is there a guideline for ap exam? > There's no fixed rule. One needs to keep enough decimal places to make answers reasonably reliable, but it's silly to report answers to the apparently-precise-but-meaningless number of places the calculator coughs up. On the AP exam we care far less about the accuracy of the decimal places than about the proper application of statistical methods and clear interpretation of results.