Randy wrote: > firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > >>In comp.theory Randy wrote: >>>Not being a mathematician, I can only guess that at its essence, > ... > >>You should stop guessing and go read about this stuff. > > > Interesting. I've read several books on higher CS theory and apparently > gained little or nothing from them. It's time for me to stop defending > the value of computational complexity and join the chorus of those who > find it rigorously meaningless to them as practitioners.
Even if we grant that, how does it justify your post? Where you're not wrong, you don't make enough sense to be wrong.
> Congrats, Steve. By quibbling over nits rather than explaining > concepts, that was your intent right?
Don't blame Stephen for your errors. There are plenty explanations of concepts around, now unfortunately including yours.