> Is there overmuch reason to believe this latest announced > proof, given the amazing record of the Jacobian problem > for eliciting bogus proofs from mathematicians of considerable > ability and reputation (as well as others, naturally)? Has, > for instance, anyone else with relevant expertise endorsed it > yet?
I have no knowledge of the proof and I'm not too interested. I just posted it to let everyone know... So it's up to you to find mistakes in the proof!