The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » Historia-Matematica

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: [HM] Not a fraction?
Replies: 1   Last Post: Feb 6, 2006 2:50 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Hans Lausch

Posts: 34
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: [HM] Not a fraction?
Posted: Feb 6, 2006 2:50 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

>Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:57:02 +1300
>From: Ken Pledger <>
>Subject: Re: [HM] Not a fraction?
>At 13:24 -0500 26/1/06, Robert Eldon Taylor wrote [of the Greeks]:

>>they seem to be very reluctant to use a fraction equal to or greater
>>than the whole. If I say I have a number of quarters in my pocket, you
>>will not be surprised to know there are four or five or more, because a
>>quarter is thought of as a distinct unit and not just a fourth of a
>>dollar. So if Archimedes or others were thinking of third or fifth as
>>new units, as you suggest, it seems they would speak also of four of
>>those thirds or five of those fifths. But they never seem to do this....

> I may have just happened upon an example in Archimedes, "On
>Conoids and Spheroids" 21 & 22. In the enunciation Heath says
>"half as large again," but in the proof he uses "3/2". At the
>same step, the 1970 French translation by Charles Mugler uses "les
>trois demis". From my ignorant viewing of the Greek text, the
>crucial word appears to be "hemiolios". Can any Greek reader shed
>some light on this please?
> Ken Pledger.

Here is a reference:

Hans Lausch

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.