Lee Rudolph wrote: > Then there's that bit where Jesus is asserted to be both a generic cardinal > *and* the first infinite ordinal.
But most Christians don't find him quite inaccessible, right? Remarkable, subtle and strong, perhaps, somewhat ineffable and indescribable at times - though probably not totally indescribable. I think I can see a set theoretical proof of the non-existence of Jesus.
-- Aatu Koskensilta (email@example.com)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus