Virgil wrote: > > > That may be your definition, but it is no one else's. > > According to the Harper Collins Dictionary of mathematics, for example, > > irrational: not expressible as a ratio of integers, > > transcendental: not the root of any polynomial equation with > rational coefficients. > > Unless you can show that your "definitions" are at least compatible with > these, yours are wrong.
You are wasting your time. Lester neither knows nor understands mathematics. If one insists on modeling the real numbers as the set of points on a Euclidean straight line, one will find the transcendentals side by side with the other real numbers.