Virgil wrote: > In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, > Lester Zick <DontBother@nowhere.net> wrote: > > >>The question I have is whether you or others believe in the >>possibility of universally exhaustively true mathematical axioms? > > > What is "truth"? > > I can deal with the tautologous logical truth of implications like "if P > then (P or Q)", but other than those, which include the more complex > logical deductions from a set of axioms, I know of no absolute truth.
If we care to consider absolute truth, then there is no such thing as an absolute truth. That is: not even "tautologous logical truth" would be absolute.