In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Lester Zick <DontBother@nowhere.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:07:44 -0600, Virgil <email@example.com> wrote: > > >In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, > > Lester Zick <DontBother@nowhere.net> wrote: > > > >> >But where does one find this alleged absolute falseness? Does Zeck have > >> >any concrete examples of this mysterious substance? > >> > >> I'm not familiar with what Zeck has. What Zick has is exhaustive > >> alternatives neither of which you seem willing to acknowledge is true > >> or false but prefer to demand examples of things which are true or > >> false instead so you can argue about their truth or falsity instead of > >> universally true and false alternatives in general. > > > >Apparently Zick has nothing that Zeck does not have. > > > >Zick has presented no "exhaustive alternatives", he merely keeps talking > >as if there were some. > > And Verge keeps talking as if there were none.
I am talking as if it has not ben established whether there are any, at least until one has assumed something on which to base distinguishing alternatives.