On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 12:37:31 -0600, Virgil <email@example.com> wrote:
>In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, > Lester Zick <DontBother@nowhere.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:07:44 -0600, Virgil <email@example.com> wrote: >> >> >In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, >> > Lester Zick <DontBother@nowhere.net> wrote: >> > >> >> >But where does one find this alleged absolute falseness? Does Zeck have >> >> >any concrete examples of this mysterious substance? >> >> >> >> I'm not familiar with what Zeck has. What Zick has is exhaustive >> >> alternatives neither of which you seem willing to acknowledge is true >> >> or false but prefer to demand examples of things which are true or >> >> false instead so you can argue about their truth or falsity instead of >> >> universally true and false alternatives in general. >> > >> >Apparently Zick has nothing that Zeck does not have. >> > >> >Zick has presented no "exhaustive alternatives", he merely keeps talking >> >as if there were some. >> >> And Verge keeps talking as if there were none. > >I am talking as if it has not ben established whether there are any, at >least until one has assumed something on which to base distinguishing >alternatives.
Assumed the truth of something used to establish the truth of what is assumed.