>>>If "absolute truth" means "something that is true regardless of which >>>semantics you use" then you're right, no absolute truths exist. This is >>>not a very interesting point.
>>Right. That's why it seems interesting (to me) that occasionally there >>are "faithful debates" about what shouldn't be interesting: "absolute" >>truth! > > I think when these debates take place people are usually getting > interested in absolute truth in a different sense to the sense you're > talking about.
Would you be able to give a specific example of another different sense, in which an *absolute* truth could be defined and be interested by *more than one person*?