On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:54:29 -0600, Virgil <email@example.com> wrote:
>In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, > Lester Zick <DontBother@nowhere.net> wrote: > >> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:42:02 -0600, Virgil <email@example.com> wrote: >> > >> >Zick again exhibits his penchant for seeing things which do not exist. >> >I am critical of your general claim, as you have not been able to >> >bolster it with anything other than mere restatement of the claim itself. >> >> Which you appear unwilling or unable to evaluate. > >I tend to resist acceptance of claims which are presented, as Zick's >are, without persuasive evidence in support of them. > >If one presents an axiom system and says "IF we assume this system such >and such follows", and then presents some evidence the such and such >actually does follow, I am much more accepting. > >Zick claims to have things follow from nothing at all, and then presents >no evidence. > >I do not find his lack of evidence persuasive.
As previously noted, which you are unwilling or unable to evaluate. Not my problem.