On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 19:19:57 -0600, Virgil <email@example.com> wrote:
>In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, > Lester Zick <DontBother@nowhere.net> wrote: > >> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:21:33 -0600, Virgil <email@example.com> wrote: >> > >> > In any case, you cannot get your desired >> > result without SOME assumption. >> >> Which assumption I demonstrate the truth of tautologically whereas >> faith based math cannot demonstrate the truth of their assumptions >> syllogistically. > >Zick again claims to have demonstrated what he has not demonstrated.
And perhaps you'd care to demonstrate the truth of that assumption?