Lester Zick wrote: > On 23 Jul 2006 12:14:22 -0700, "Jiri Lebl" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >> Aatu Koskensilta wrote: >>> Zick is no doubt mistaken about many things, but your >>> rebuttal of his ideas is itself rather confused. The continuum >>> hypothesis does not provide an example of an A such that "A, not A" do >>> not exhaust all possibilities. >> So it is true? or it is false? > > True? What does it mean to be true?
The continuum hypothesis is true iff every set of reals is either countable or has the cardinality of the continuum.
-- Aatu Koskensilta (email@example.com)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus