In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Lester Zick <DontBother@nowhere.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:25:43 -0600, Virgil <email@example.com> wrote: > > >In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, > > Lester Zick <DontBother@nowhere.net> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:48:01 -0600, Virgil <email@example.com> wrote: > > > >> > > >> >My system, like that of most mathematicians, is not based on belief, but > >> >on what can be derived from what. > >> > >> Your system like that of all mathematikers is what can be derived from > >> what beliefs. > > > >It is false beliefs like that that typify Zick's postings. > > What false beliefs? The beliefs you believe are false beliefs because > you're too lazy or stupid to demonstrate whether what you believe are > true beliefs but continue to believe them anyway?
What "beliefs" does Zick claim to know I have?
My only relevant belief is that what can be deduced from a set of axioms can be deduced from that set of axioms. If that is what Zick believes is a false belief, then it is his belief that are false.