In article <email@example.com>, Lester Zick <DontBother@nowhere.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:09:43 -0600, Virgil <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > >In article <email@example.com>, > > Lester Zick <DontBother@nowhere.net> wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:00:26 -0600, Virgil <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > > >> >As Zick's only alternative so far is an appeal to some silly sort of > >> >absolute but amorphous truth, he appears to be equally lazy and even > >> >more stupid. > >> > >> Than faith based mathermatikers? > > > >As he is one of the most prominent of them, not necessarily, but > >certainly more so that all the multitudes of non faith based > >mathematicians. > > Of which which we have discovered none so far.
Since Zick willfully blinds himself to them, he should stop complaining that he cannot see them.