Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.



Re: [HM] Abstracted Ratio.
Posted:
Jul 26, 2006 6:22 AM


Dear Julio, Ken, Bob et al.
My reaction when reading Bob's letter was very much the same as Ken's
Newton "abstracted" from "equal ratios" to "a single ratio"
sand I just want to add, that "playing with words" he is going from "a unit" to "a unity".
I also find it interesting that as all applied mathematicians know the arguments of a mathematical function have to be "numbers", not lengths or weights or anything else  if "physical dimensions" are included then it is no longer mathematics, but physics.
So, going back in history we do find that physicists and mathematicians did have an intuitive feeling for the importance of numbers  long before they had measured the continuum with numbers.
What I have in mind is that Euclid as a mathematician only allowed proportions where both magnitudes were of the same kind  had he been a physicist he could have divided weight by volume to define density ...
Best regards
Sten Kaijser
in Uppsala
***************************************************************
Sten Kaijser
Tel +46 (0)18 471 32 24 Fax +46 (0)18 471 32 01 email: sten@math.uu.se



