The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » Inactive » Historia-Matematica

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: [HM] Abstracted Ratio.
Replies: 3   Last Post: Aug 1, 2006 3:09 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Sten Kaijser

Posts: 35
Registered: 12/3/04
Re: [HM] Abstracted Ratio.
Posted: Jul 26, 2006 6:22 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Dear Julio, Ken, Bob et al.

My reaction when reading Bob's letter was very much the same as Ken's

Newton "abstracted" from "equal ratios" to "a single ratio"

sand I just want to add, that "playing with words" he is going from "a
unit" to "a unity".

I also find it interesting that as all applied mathematicians know the
arguments of a mathematical function have to be "numbers", not lengths or
weights or anything else - if "physical dimensions" are included then it
is no longer mathematics, but physics.

So, going back in history we do find that physicists and mathematicians
did have an intuitive feeling for the importance of numbers - long before
they had measured the continuum with numbers.

What I have in mind is that Euclid as a mathematician only allowed
proportions where both magnitudes were of the same kind - had he been a
physicist he could have divided weight by volume to define density ...

Best regards

Sten Kaijser

in Uppsala


Sten Kaijser

Tel +46 (0)18 471 32 24
Fax +46 (0)18 471 32 01

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.