On 29 Jul 2006 22:18:56 GMT, Chris Menzel <email@example.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 22:12:18 +0300, Aatu Koskensilta ><firstname.lastname@example.org> said: >> Chris Menzel wrote: >>> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 09:16:14 -0700, Lester Zick >>> <email@example.com> said: >>>> On 28 Jul 2006 16:48:25 GMT, Chris Menzel >>>> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> See also P. Maddy, "Believing the Axioms I" (Journal of Symbolic Logic >>>>> 53(2) (1988) 481-511) and "Believing the Axioms II" (JSL 53(3) (1988) >>>>> 736-764). >>>> Or "Faith Based Math". >>> >>> You believe you know the content of these papers and the philosophical >>> inclinations of their author on the basis of their titles? Quite an act >>> of faith, that. >> >> No, no. It must be the contradiction of a false truth of a negation or >> whatever it is Zick's been going on about. > >I think that it is not the case that you both are and are not not correct.
Or that Zick's theory of truth is mechanical and that of mathematikers is not.