Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: The Physics Establishment: Choir Of Parrots
Replies: 19   Last Post: Aug 13, 2006 3:04 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
schoenfeld1@gmail.com

Posts: 278
Registered: 3/16/05
Re: The Physics Establishment: Choir Of Parrots
Posted: Aug 12, 2006 4:30 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


John P. wrote:
> "Schoenfeld" wrote in a message
>

> >> That's an excellent observation. ... but wrong. I am unconcerned with the
> >> 9/11 commission report. I am looking at a video in which the tower has
> >> not
> >> yet completely collapsed at the 12 second mark. I suggest that one would
> >> have a very hard time believing that this tower somehow fell in 9.5
> >> seconds,
> >> while seeing a portion of it still standing, and the collapse continuing,
> >> at
> >> the 12 seconds.

>
> > You're right, the the north tower did not collapse in the 6 seconds
> > 'conspiracy theorists' claim WTC 7 collapsed in.. I never thought of it
> > in that way, thanks for clarifying that up, Goldstein...

>
> Or the 9.5 I listed in the above paragraph. Are you dyslexic or just
> illiterate?


The South tower collapsed in 9.5 seconds is the contention of those who
populate reality, the south tower. You are showing video of the North
tower.

> >> Did it? I'd appreciate any links or references you could provide that
> >> would
> >> help me to understand this. Of the information I have read from engineers
> >> to
> >> date, the buildings did not fall at freefall speed and there was nothing
> >> suspicious about the speed or manner in which they collapse.

>
> > There is virtually no information from NIST/FEMA/government on WTC 7.
> > You are demonstrably a liar.

>
> Looks like illiterate wins, eh? Can you find "NIST", "FEMA" or "government"
> in my above comment?


NIST admit they cannot account for WTC 7, FEMA does not even mention
it. 9/11 Commission report does not mention WTC 7. Your mind cannot
comphrehend reality.

> Your inability to respond to any of the facts present, or to provide
> counterarguments or evidence is noted.


How is it possible to respond to someone who says that WTC 7 did not
collapse in 6 seconds when the video clearly shows that it collapsed in
6 seconds?Why are you showing video of the North tower?

Given that all indicators show a new government-sponsored 9/11 attack
is on the verge of execution, wasting time arguing with you is
dangerous waste of time.




Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.