Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
NCTM or The Math Forum.



Re: squaring a circle
Posted:
Dec 14, 2003 10:50 AM


On 13 Dec 2003, Mensanator wrote: >>Subject: squaring a circle >>From: vsvasan@md4.vsnl.net.in (vsvasan) >>Date: 12/13/2003 10:01 AM Central Standard Time >>Messageid: <200312131554.hBDFsLE09237@proapp.mathforum.org> >> >> >> Sub: Unsolvabve Geometrical Problems >> Squaring a given circle is unsolvable . > >And its unsolvabilty has been proven.
One has to digest this alleged "proof". Have You? I tried to follow those guys who made Marathons to succeed this goal as they could not reach the " Sour Grapes". What some of them devised lightheartedly ,the invention and use(God knows howThe King is Naked...)of the HALF PART of EULERS Equation: e^(ipi)=1 but for JUSTICE to prevail since EULER'S Equation states that: e^(iPi)=cos(pi)+i[sin(pi)] then e^(ipi)=1 + i(0) , thus the other solution is e^(ipi)=0.
So take Your pick! This is what this group of guys did not take into consideration! Panagiotis Stefanides http://www.stefanides.gr/theo_circle.htm http://www.stefanides.gr http://www.stefanides.gr_why_logarithm
> >>There are volumes of pages on the >>subject which I have read  from Archimedes to SrinivasaRamanujan. > >And none of them proved it. So what? > >> Well! I have found out a solution. > >No, you haven't. > >>Could not believe it ? > >Belief is irrelevant. It's been proven impossible. > >>My logic is very simple. > >And wrong. > >>"Pi" is an irrational number. > >It's also transcendental. > >>So is square root of 2. > >But the square root of 2 is _not_ transcendental. Look up the difference. > >>There is a simple >>geometrical construction to solve for square root of 2. > >Nobody said that was impossible. > >>Similarly I have >>developed a simple geometrical construction to solve for "pi". > >If you constructed it, what you have is _not_ pi, because pi cannot be >constructed. > >> My question is Where to send it? > >The circular file. > >>Is there any Maths Forum where I can >>present my papers and answer questions of the experts? > >Sure, right here on sci.math. But instead of crowing about your proof, try >asking for >help in understanding why it's wrong. > >> >> May I request you to kindly guide me in this regard. > >Sorry, I wouldn't be able to find your fallacy even though I know it exists. > >>Thank you >> > > > >Mensanator >Ace of Clubs



