toshiaki wrote: > "Tony Orlow" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message > news:email@example.com... >> ooo wrote: >>> "Tony Orlow" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message >>> news:email@example.com... >>>> toshiaki wrote: >>>>>> :) >>>>>> >>>>>> 0 e R >>>>>> x e R -> 2^x e R ^ -(2^x) e R > . > If you think that size is only relativistic ,I understand your idea .
I think that size of infinite sets can only be measured using formulas on a standard infinite unit.
> If not ,I don't know how do you solve the question of scale .
I don't see why you need to even consider your distance from the line.
> And I f you please , explane about above relation .
The above is like the Peano axioms, but defining an uncountable tree of reals. It generates the reals from the starting point of 0. I call them the H-riffic numbers, partly because they get rather hard to calculate.
> I think your idea is simillarity to measure theory . > > Regards > Ozaki Tosiaki > >