|
|
Re: New Math: What am I missing?
Posted:
Mar 7, 2007 6:15 PM
|
|
No matter how many times you point us to this useless post that
informs us only of the table of contents and says NOTHING about the
way in which the topics, which look AWFULLY SIMILAR to me, are
presented in the two books, your post, like all of your posts, is
utterly useless.
The day you have the integrity and industry to actually write an
analysis about how the books differ and why one is superior, you'll
have made your first meaningful contribution to this list.
Until that time, and that day may never come (to quote THE
GODFATHER), you'll just be another grinch who is upset because time
won't stand still for you.
On Mar 7, 2007, at 4:15 PM, Domenico Rosa wrote:
> Some information about my traditional Euclidean Geometry textbook
> is posted at:
>
> http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=1477342&tstart=0
>
|
|
