Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Failing Linear Algebra:
Replies: 54   Last Post: Jan 10, 2007 12:47 PM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Guest
Re: Failing Linear Algebra:
Posted: Apr 28, 2004 6:32 PM

Russell:

> If the kernel
>is {0}, i.e. the set of rows (or the set of columns) of the matrix is
>linearly independent, and the matrix is square, then the matrix is
>invertible and you have an isomorphism. Otherwise, one or more rows
>or columns is a linear combination of the others; and that means there
>are nonzero vectors which, when multiplied by your matrix, give zero.
>In other words, those vectors are members of the kernel of your linear
>transformation. See how it all fits together?

Right. So, if a matrix is homogenous and in echelon form, the number of free
variables is the same as the kernel, because if any free variable is set equal
to 0, then the system holds. Therefore, the number of basic variables is the
same as the image, right?

>Btw you asked elsewhere what an eigenvalue is. The definition is
>simplicity itself, learn it!

Yeah, I know the definition. I think I stated it in a post already.

>Btw I found nothing objectionable
>about Lipschutz from an abstract point of view; if he made it any
>simpler he would mislead, but he treads that fine line very nicely
>IMHO.

OK, thanks. I'll be sure to use it to study.

>Usenet will probably be too slow for your needs this week; who wants
>to type in those matrices in ASCII anyway.

Right, Usenet can be a little slow, but I thank you guys for your speed in
responding. It's my fault that I left this thread (and all its great
responses) hanging for a while. I forgot about it.... Anyways, even if your
suggestions are too slow to help me on Friday's test, they may come in handy on
my final. So, please, don't hesitate to fill me in whenever I've made a
mistake.

BTW, I'm good enough with matrices that I can understand them if they're just
typed like:

2 1 4 6
3 5 8 1
1 5 2 2

etc.

Date Subject Author
4/22/04 Guest
4/22/04 Michael N. Christoff
1/10/07 Gerry Myerson
1/10/07 Jonathan Miller
1/10/07 Guest
1/10/07 David C. Ullrich
1/10/07 Acid Pooh
1/10/07 Guest
4/23/04 Brian Borchers
4/27/04 Guest
1/10/07 maky m.
4/26/04 David Ames
1/10/07 Guest
1/10/07 Michael Stemper
1/10/07 maky m.
4/23/04 Porker899
4/27/04 Guest
1/10/07 Abraham Buckingham
1/10/07 Mitch Harris
1/10/07 Guest
1/10/07 Grey Knight
1/10/07 Guest
1/10/07 Toni Lassila
1/10/07 Thomas Nordhaus
1/10/07 George Cox
4/28/04 Dave Rusin
4/28/04 George Cox
4/28/04 George Cox
4/29/04 Marc Olschok
4/29/04 Mitch Harris
4/29/04 Robert Israel
4/28/04 Guest
4/29/04 Guest
1/10/07 Dave Rusin