> If you insist, here is the first obvious mistake in the paper: > > ------------------------------------------- > Let S be the set of all real numbers in the interval [0,1] > Let T be the set of all real numbers in the interval (-1,0] > > If you applied an operator '+' to these two sets that sums the elements > of both sets, you would get: S + T = 1 > ------------------------------------------- > > You are trying to sum an uncountable set of numbers. Please define what > this means. Also consider: if you pair the numbers differently, can you > make the sum come out to something else? > > FInally, I didn't notice anything looking like a proof in your article, > though I admit I haven't read all of it. > > -- > Eric Schmidt > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
Hi Eric,
what I am attempting to point out in the S + T result is that any element of the infinite set T corresponds to exactly one element in the infinite set S of equal value and opposite sign, except for the positive 1 in set S. Should you hold the infinity of values in your awareness, all cancel except for one that cannot.
You would not be able to have a final result upon summing the entire infinity of elements in S union T other than 1.
