On 25 Jul, 19:13, arithmonic <djes...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 25 jul, 11:26, "sttscitr...@tesco.net" <sttscitr...@tesco.net> > wrote: > > > > IF YOU LIKE TO ENJOY BEST APPROXIMATIONS, THEN LOOK AT THE ARITHMONIC > > > MEAN PROCESSES SHOWN IN MY WEBPAGES. > > [CUT] > > > Or are you simply a grandiloquent windbag ? > > The sci.math audience can see that you have no choice but to insult, > you and your friend have shown an unethical attitude and you should > cogitate on that. The only person being unethical is you. You make unsubstantiated claims, based on your bizarre imagings and expect to be believed without proof. Instead of twittering endlessly like a broken record, produce a rational case for your rather improbable claims.
Start your case with this challenge as you claim your method produces best rational approximations.
Demonstrate how your method solves x^2 -69y^2=1 using the best rational approximations you can muster.
As you seem unable to actually use your own method, perhaps it is not really your method at all.
