On 25 Jul, 23:40, arithmonic <djes...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 25 jul, 16:22, "sttscitr...@tesco.net" <sttscitr...@tesco.net>
> Ask to Newton's , Halley's, etc. whatever you want to ask I have no > intentions to answer > any other question from you and your friend Grover Hughes.
Yes, because you cannot answer may questions. Essentially you have no idea what you are talling about.
> If you think that you can make me upset, your are WRONG, so WRONG.
The capitalization alone suggets you are disturbed in some way.
> What would had happened if, for instance, Platón, > Nichomacus, Wallis, etc. would had found such high-order arithmetical > methods in such a trivial-arithmetical way?
I doubt they would obsess over something so trivial.
> What really matters is that : > "THE EXTREMELY SIMPLE HIGH-ORDER METHODS SHOWN IN MY WEBPAGES --BASED > ON THE RATIONAL MEAN-- > DO NOT APPEAR IN NEITHER ANY CHINESE, NOR ARAB, NOR INDIAN, NOR > WESTERN BOOK, > since ancient Babylonian times UP TO NOW!!! AND YOU WILL REALIZE THAT > NO MATHEMATICIAN nor any math-historian will be able to deny such a > crude fact.
How can you know this ? Have you read every book published since Babylonian times ?
Anyway, I'm beginning to doubt that the method you claim to be yourrs is actually yours because you don't know how to use it.