On 26 Jul, 03:14, arithmonic <djes...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 25 jul, 19:10, "sttscitr...@tesco.net" <sttscitr...@tesco.net>
> I have never asserted in any posting from mine nor in my webpages, nor > in my book, nor in any paper that "The methods shown in my webpages > yield ALL THE BEST APPROXIMATIONS".
You seem to be more adept at sophistry than maths
Can you prove that your method produces any best approximations ? Not all, but any ? When does your method produce best approximations and when not? Do you even understand what I am asking you ?
A simple proof will suffice. I certainly won't be reading pages of your mindless rantings which have no mathematical significance whatsoever.
Why waste time with pointless verbiage when you could provide a proof ?
