arithmetic
Posts:
106
From:
venezuela
Registered:
1/23/06
|
|
Re: cube root of a given number
Posted:
Jul 26, 2007 8:56 PM
|
|
Summarizing, a bunch of parrot-fashion psychopaths who enjoy anonymity
because of their cowardice and incapacity to prevent people from
learning these new methods :
1.- Failed to present any precedents on the new simple methods based
on the Rational Mean
http://mipagina.cantv.net/arithmetic/rmdef.htm
Which is the very essence of my first posting, so they were forced to
try to rise many other issues and false statments to hide their
incapacity and rash comments on this matter.
2.- Failed to present any posting from mine stating: "My methods
always yield ALL THE BEST APPROXIMATIONS". They were challenged to do
that but failed.
4.- Failed to try to discredit the new extremely simple high-order
arithmetical algorithms by stating that they do not produce best
approximations (which is of course another lie that anyone can confirm
by reading my wepages), because they are not acquainted with the fact
that any root-solving algorithm only need to hold true convergence
towards the root value (according to the standard convergence
criteria), so the issue on best approximations is by no means a
requisite for being considered as a trully good algorithm. Their
ignorance on mathematics does not matter, at all, but their
psychopathic behavior and stupidity is really disgusting.
3.- Showed a shameful unethical and psychopathic behavior and huge
cheeks, and of course
a cowardly tendency to anonymity.
4.- Failed their attempts to try to divert the issue on root-solving
to the issue on philology and gramatical use of the phrase :
"GENERALIZED CONTINUED FRACTION".
Considering their anonymous parrot-fashion psychopath behavior I am
now so worried that they could actually be math teachers, I hope they
don't, indeed, but might it be.
Actually, in so many schools we have witnessed many irrational and
violent actions of young students when reacting against their
teachers.
Now that I think that, I am so worried about these parrot-fashion
psychopaths
So...to the point on the essence of all this thread:
As said in the first posting of this thread, I face and maintain what
follows and will always do:
******** DEDICATED TO ALL YOUNG MATH STUDENTS ******************
It is just disturbing to realize these so simple arithmetical methods
DO NOT APPEAR in any book on numbers since ancient times up to now:
http://mipagina.cantv.net/arithmetic/rmdef.htm
References and links can be found at:
http://mipagina.cantv.net/arithmetic
THESE SO SIMPLE METHODS DO NOT APPEAR IN NEITHER ANY CHINESE, NOR
ARAB, NOR INDIAN, NOR WESTERN BOOK, since ancient Babylonian times UP
TO NOW!!!
AND YOU WILL REALIZE THAT NO MATHEMATICIAN nor any math-historian
will
be able to deny such a crude fact.
Whatever...
There are very good news here, specially, for young people because
from now on, by means of simple arithmetic they will be able to learn
at secondary school --by means of the most simple arithmetic-- many
new simple higher-order algorithms, as well as all those well-known
cartesian-infinitesimal algorithms (i.e.: Halley's, Newton's,
Bernoulli's and Householder's) which have been considered as superb
achievements of the history of mathematics, however, one can see now
that all those "superb" achievements can be easily developed by means
of the most simple arithmetic.
Young student, be sure there is something very wrong with the whole
Cartesian-Infinitesimal scheme we have inherited.
Yours is the chance to find new ways on mathematics.
Ing. Domingo Gomez Morin
Structural Engineer
Caracas Venezuela
|
|
