The more agitated you become, the more infantile your arguments. I wonder if Gottfried Helms still thinks your contribution to mathematical knowledge is still quite so fantastic. At least he can have no doubts that you are teetering on the verge of insanity.
> 1.- Failed to present any precedents on the new simple > methods based on the Rational
Your method is facile, who but a retard would wriite it down for posterity ? > > 2.- Failed to present any posting from mine stating: "My methods > always yield ALL THE BEST APPROXIMATIONS". They were challenged to do > that but failed.
Your post that I cited clearly confirms that you claim to produce generalized continued fractions from the "rational mean". It's not a continued fraction unless it can produce preferably all but at least some best rational simultaneous approximation.
Presumably, your generalized continued fractions can produce at least one best rational simultaneous approximation. If so produce a BRSA to cubt(69*69), cubrt(69).
You won't be able to because you have no idea whatsoever what you are taling about.