On 27 Jul, 16:21, arithmonic <djes...@gmail.com> wrote: > wrote: > On 26 jul, 22:16, "sttscitr...@tesco.net" <sttscitr...@tesco.net> > wrote: > You are just an ignorant
Well, you should be able to explain to the ignorant how this works.
> You are clearly unable to realize that I believe it can be found a > missing mathematics, a true natural mathematics that does not require, > at all, any BIZARRE Imaginary Number Concept, notice that I say > bizarre even when some people have found practical applications for > them. I think that a true natural science of mathematics should not be > just a bunch of bizarre tricks and patches whic have been forced to > match some particular needs.
Really, you are even nuttier than I first thought. Some achievement on your part.
> Consequently, you are unable to realize that I do not care about the > bizarre imaginary numbers concept (even when they are widely applied > in engineering).
So what are the roots of x^2 +1 = 0 or x^4 +1 =0?
> I think that Imaginary numbers are not part of a true natural science > but just TRICKS AND PATCHES.
