On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:17:54 -0800 (PST), Marshall <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>On Dec 21, 6:52 am, quasi <qu...@null.set> wrote: >> On 21 Dec 2007 16:41:26 +0200, Phil Carmody >> >> >> >> Forget gaps -- your method is biased! >> >> >> >Already responded to that irrelevancy elsewhere in the thread. >> >> >> Already responded to your weak coverup ploy. >> >> >So I saw. And laughed. >> >> I think you're in the wrong field. > >quasi, > >Phil is doing the whole thing deliberately. The guy asked >the question badly, so Phil intentionally responded badly; >i.e., with a biased solution. On purpose.
He posts a deliberately flawed solution _after_ I had already posted a correct one (about 20 minutes after), and then baits me when I challenge his claimed solution.