MDT?s Fundamental Clues Imagine a simple theory that explained and accounted for the following: 1. Light?s velocity is a constant c. 2. Light?s velocity c is independent of its source. 3. Nothing can travel faster than c. 4. A photon, which travels at c, does not age, defining simultaneity. 5. Energy and mass are equivalent. E=mc^2 6. Matter can appear as energy or mass. 7. When matter appears as energy, it propagates at c through space. 8. All matter has particle?local?and wave?nonlocal?properties. 9. All energy has particle?local?and wave?nonlocal?properties. 10. When matter appears as stationary mass, it propagates at c through the fourth dimension. 11. When matter appears as energy, it propagates at c through the fourth dimension. 12. To move at c through space is to stand still in the fourth dimension. 13. To move at c through the fourth dimension is to stand still in space. 14. All objects move at but one speed through spacetime?c. 15. The universe is expanding. 16. Radiation expands outwards, not inwards. 17. Entropy imitates the general motion of all radiation and the universe?s expansion?a spherically-symmetric expanding wave. 18. Huygen?s Principle, which underlies all reality ranging from QED to Feynman?s many-paths, to classical physics, states that every point of a spherically-expanding wavefront is in turn a spherically- expanding wavefront. 19. A photon is described by a spherically expanding wavefront propagating at c. 20. Two initially-interacting photons remain entangled, no matter how far they travel. 21. Two initially-interacting photons remain the exact same age as when they began, no matter how far they travel. 22. Young?s double-slit experiments show that mass and energy have nonlocal wave properties. 23. The collapse of the wave function is immediate in the photoelectric effect. 24. There is no way for an object to gain velocity without being reduced in length via relativistic length contraction. 25. A photon traces out a null vector through spacetime. 26. Time?s arrow points in a definitive direction. 27. Entropy increases. 28. Moving clocks run slow. 29. Time travel into the past is impossible. 30. Free will exists. 31. Time is not frozen?the block universe does not exist. 32. The velocity of probability is c, as a photon?s probabilistic wavefront travels at c. 33. The velocity of quantum entanglement is c. 34. In Schroedinger?s equation, the first derivative with respect to the fourth dimension is proportional two the second derivative with the respect to the three spatial dimensions. Any change in position in the fourth expanding dimension is an acceleration in the three spatial dimensions. 35. A photon emitted from the sun is redshifted as it travels away. Its wavelength appears longer as it is measured against space that is less-streched. A photon inherits the local geometry of the spacetime where it was emitted. Now imagine if there was one simple principle underlying and unifying all these clues with a fundamental physical model. That would be MDT: The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. dx4/dt = ic
The fourth dimension expands at the rate of c. The fourth dimension has local and nonlocal properties. Photons surf the fourth expanding dimension. Energy is but matter trapped on the fourth expanding dimension. Hence E=mc^2. Relativity freezes the fourth dimension, whereas quantum mechanics is built upon its flux?hence the differential operators. Entropy and Huygen?s principle rest upon the fourth expanding dimension, as do all photons which surf its expanding wavefront. Nonlocality arises because the fourth dimension is nonlocal as it expands. Simultaneity is relative because our measurement of time is relative to our propagation with respect to the fourth expanding dimension. Time is not the fourth dimension, but a phenomenon that emerges because a fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. The block universe does not exist, as the past is but a memory of a state that is long since gone. Wave interference arises because of probability interference, and probability is defined by the expansion of the fourth dimension, which distributes the locality of a dimensions upon an spherically-symmetric wavefront, where all points yet are one point in that dimension; until the wave is measured, and the particle is localized in the three spatial dimensions. All motion requires that an object have a component in the source of all motion?the fourth expanding dimension. Hence all moving objects are foreshoterned.
On Apr 22, 9:43 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...@gmail.com wrote: > On Apr 22, 10:10 am, hedgefundphys...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > Moving Dimensions Theory > > by Dr. Ranger McCoy > > > ABSTRACT > > Moving Dimensions Theory postulates that the fourth dimension is > > expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions, symbolized by the > > equation: > > > dx4/dt =ic > > >http://physicsmathforums.com > > > MDT provides a physical model underlying both quantum mechanical and > > relativistic phenomenon. The simple postulate accounts for quantum > > mechanics? action-at-a-distance and relativity?s length contraction, > > as well as entanglement and the equivalence of mass and energy. MDT > > provides a simple physical model showing that diverse dualities?wave/ > > particle, time/space, and mass/energy?all originate from the same > > principle. MDT provides a physical model underlying entropy and > > unifying time?s thermodynamic, classical, quantum, and radiative > > arrows. MDT provides a physical model accounting for the constant > > velocity of light, the fact that the maximum velocity through space is > > c, and the fact that c is independent of the velocity of the source, > > as MDT considers photons as matter surfing the fourth expanding > > dimension. Nonlocality is accounted for by an expanding fourth > > dimension that is inherently nonlocal, and MDT shows that this > > fundamental expansion is the origin of quantum mechanic?s > > probability. MDT provides a physical model for time?time is not the > > fourth dimension, but rather a phenomenon that emerges from a physical > > reality wherein the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the > > three spatial dimensions. The theory resolves the EPR paradox while > > also liberating us from the block universe implied by Einstein?s > > relativity. Relativity freezes the expansion of the fourth dimension, > > only ever considering instantaneous snapshots of the universe. > > Quantum Mechanics treats the fourth dimension as a dynamical element. > > Hence quantum mechanics is a science defined by flux?by differential > > operators. > > > I. MDT in Complete Agreement with Quantum Mechanics and Relativity > > Moving Dimensions Theory is in complete agreement with all > > experimental tests and phenomena associated with special and general > > relativity. MDT is in complete agreement with all physical phenomena > > as predicted by quantum mechanics and demonstrated in extensive > > experiments. The genius and novelty of MDT is that it presents a > > common physical model which shows that curious phenomena from both > > relativity and quantum mechanics derive from the same fundamental > > physical reality. > > Nowhere does String Theory (ST) nor Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) account > > for quantum entanglement nor relativistic time dilation. MDT shows > > these derive from the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does > > ST nor LQG account for wave-particle duality nor relativistic length > > contraction. MDT shows these derive from the same underlying physical > > reality. Nowhere does ST nor LQG account for the constant speed of > > light, nor the independence of the speed of light on the velocity of > > the source, nor entropy, nor time's arrow. MDT shows these derive from > > the same underlying physical reality. Nowhere does String Theory nor > > Loop Quantum Gravity resolve the paradox of Godel's Block Universe > > which troubled Einstein. MDT resolves this paradox. String Theory and > > LQG lack definitive equations, whereas MDT presents a simple equation: > > > It will be shown that relativity can be derived from this simple > > equation, as we return to Einstein?s original work. It will be noted > > that Einstein never stated that time is the fourth dimension, rather, > > he and Minkowski?s formulations imply that the fourth dimension, > > represented by x4 is equal to ict. Or x4 = ict. > > > I. The Derivation of Einstein?s Relativity from Moving Dimensions > > Theory > > > The fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial > > dimensions. This simple postulate and reality underlies Einstein?s > > two postulates of relativity, and it can be expressed mathematically > > as: > > dx4/dt =ic > > > This equation agrees with Einstein. Nowhere did Einstein ever say > > that time is the fourth dimension. Rather he and Minkowski stated Or > > x4 = ict. > > Many trained physicists have a knee-jerk reaction that the fourth > > dimension cannot be moving because ?dimensions cannot move.? But > > dimensions can and do move. First off, since the universe is > > expanding, space-time is also expanding, demonstrating that dimensions > > are moving and expanding. Secondly, general relativity demonstrates > > that massive objects warp space-time, meaning that as a massive object > > moves though space-time, it stretches space-time, showing again that > > space-time in one area can move, or deform, relative to space-time in > > another area. GR is a sound theory, backed up with multiple high- > > profile experiments, including the demonstration that starlight is > > bent by the sun and the verification that orbiting stars radiate > > energy in the form of gravity waves. Thus there exist neither > > philosophical nor physical barriers to the concept of moving > > dimensions, but for artificial ones within lazy minds. > > A curious sign of the times is that physicists will accept on blind > > faith the existence of ten, twenty, or thirty dimensions, dimensions > > that are curled up, or too small to measure, and yet they will reel in > > shock and horror at a perfectly obvious postulate?the fourth dimension > > is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. They are to be > > forgiven?it has been a long time since a simple postulate has been > > offered in the realm of physics, and the foreign nature of truth?s > > simple beauty is seen as a violent affront to the String Theorist?s > > convoluted sensibilities. > > Let us derive Einstein?s relativity and the Lorentz Transformations > > from MDT?s simple formula: > > > Let D be the constant -ica+x4(a) and re-label u with t. Then we have > > > Dropping the arbitrary constant, we get: > > > Or > > > x4 = ict > > > Armed with this simple and most remarkable result, we are ready to > > return to Einstein?s 1912 manuscript, and provide the motivation for a > > four-dimensional coordinate system where the fourth dimension is > > written as x4 = ict. > > In his 1912 manuscript on relativity, Einstein wrote: > > > Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation > > The principle of the constancy of the velocity of light demands the > > existence of a reference system ? relative to which every light ray > > propagates in vacuum with velocity c. According to the relativity > > principle, all reference system?? in uniform translation motion to ? > > must possess the same property. Together with Laue, we call each > > such system ?justified.? Now we ask: What kind of transformation > > equations must obtain between the space-time coordinates x, y, z, t > > (with respect to ?) and x?,y?,c?,t? (with respect to ??) of the same > > point event so that the principle of the constancy of the velocity of > > light would hold with respect to both systems? > > We can further demand, without reducing their generality, that the > > transformation equations be homogeneous, because all that is needed > > for this is that the path described by the origin of ?? with respect > > to ? pass through the origin of ?, and that the origin of time scales > > in ? and ?? be chosen in such a way that the clocks located at the > > origins of the systems ? and ?? both read zero at the moment when the > > two points coincide. > > Suppose that at this moment of the coincidence of the two origins a > > vacuum light signal is sent from O or O?, which, according to the > > principle of the constancy of the velocity of light, propagates in a > > spherical wave with respect to both systems then the spatial points > > that are just reached by the signal at times t and t? with respect to > > ? and ??, respectively, will be determined by the equations > > > and > > > This means that the equations > > > and > > > must be equivalent. Thus, the transformation equations that we are > > seeking must be so constituted that the second equation turns into the > > first one if x?,y?,z?,t? are replaced by their expressions in terms of > > x,y,c,t. The transformation must therefore make the equation > > > into an identity, where all that we know about the factor ?2 for the > > time being is that it must not vanish. But one can see that ?2 must > > be independent of x, y, z, t, for otherwise the right-hand side > > divided by ?2 could not be a homogeneous, complete function of second > > order in x,y,z,t after the substitution is carried out. For now we > > will examine the substitution for the case ?2 = 1 and we will show > > later that from a physical point of view this is the only case > > deserving of consideration. Instead of (15), we then have: > > > If one introduces the variable u? = ict or u? = ict? in place of the > > time variables t, where i denotes the imaginary unit, one obtains, > > instead of (15a), the form > > > Note that Einstein simply states ?If one introduces the variable u? = > > ict or u? = ict? in place of the time variables t,? but he does not > > state why this works. MDT tells us why this works. It works because > > the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial > > dimensions. It works because x4 = ict and > > > Einstein continues in his 1912 Manuscript: > > > As is well known, this choice of time variables derives from > > Minkowski. Its great significance consists in the fact that by means > > of it, equation (15a), which governs the substitution that we are > > seeking, is brought into a form into which the spatial coordinates and > > the temporal coordinate enter in the same manner. > > Let the coefficients of the substitution that we are seeking be > > denoted as in the accompanying array; the second horizontal row, for > > example, shall signify > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -