Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



Re: Completing a square
Posted:
Jun 23, 2008 3:00 PM


> Yes. The square root of a perfect square always gives > a "non compex number". 1.234 is a "non compex number" > because 1.234 is simply an integer, 1234 / 100. pi / > 2*pi is a "non compex number" = 1 / 2. pi * pi is a > complex number, yet it is a perfect square. It is > only a perfect square if one divides the result by > pi, giving an integer. Note: since pi is undefined > (can not be evaluated since its value goes > indefinatly and can only be known if one lives > forever), then an "integer representation is used, a > symbol, pi (like an apple is an integer > reprepresentation of an infintly complex object of > cells))
I can't help but wonder if you aren't doing this intentionally!
First, its "complex" not "compex". 1.234 IS a "noncomplex" number but NOT because it "is simply an integer". 1.234= 1234/1000 is a RATIONAL NUMBER, not an integer. pi*pi is NOT a complex number, it is a real number, just like pi is (the square of any noncomplex number is noncomplex).
pi is certainly NOT "undefined". It has several equivalent definitions. One is that pi is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. Another is that pi is the period of the periodic function sin(x). It is true that pi cannot be written, in our decimal numeration system, in a finite number of digits but that has nothing to do with it being "defined". And, finally, I cannot see what you mean by the use of the Greek letter pi, or any other symbol, to represent an irrational number being an "integer representation".
I would like to believe this is just because English is not your native language but your grammer seems excellent.



