Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: stop teaching shifting & stretching?
Replies: 14   Last Post: Oct 19, 1998 8:58 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Chris & Sheila King Posts: 484 Registered: 12/6/04
Re: stop teaching shifting & stretching?
Posted: Oct 12, 1998 8:07 PM

[e-mailed and posted to the ap-calc mailing list]:

On Mon, 12 Oct 1998 13:54:27 -0400, "William J. Larson"
<Bill_Larson@compuserve.com> wrote about stop teaching shifting &
stretching?:

:Since my calculus students will have graphers, is it the
:consensus that I should stop teaching my precalculus
:students such tricks to aide graphing as shifting & stretching
:functions and symmetry? I'd love to stop teaching this, because it
:would free time for other "essential" topics, which I do not
:get to.

I would certainly not concur with that.

Students should learn to understand function behavior and how changing
one quantity affects the overall behavior of the function.

For instance, if I take a given function y = f(x) and change it to
produce a new function y = 2f(x) the students should CERTAINLY
understand that this has the effect of doubling all the function values,
or y-coordinates, which is WHY the graph appears to stretch.

Perhaps, since they have graphers, you could ask them to explain, in
terms of x and f(x), why the graph appears the "stretch".

Understanding interactions between quantities in equations and being
able to express these understandings is important in mathematics, I
believe.

Symmetry, I believe, is an extremely important topic. I just took Math
317 at Cal Poly Pomona this summer (Fourier Analysis and Laplace
Transforms) and we repeatedly remarked on the symmetry of functions in
that course. I spend time on that topic as part of my PreCalc review at
the beginning of my PreCalc course. I want my students to be able to use
symmetry as an aide to save them time and work on Calculus problems.

Out of curiosity, what are the other "essential" topics that you do not
get to that you believe are more important? With the advent of
calculators such as the TI-89, I'd think we could rationalize away
almost our whole K-12 curriculum, if we so chose to.

Sheila King

------
http://www.wenet.net/~cking/sheila/

Date Subject Author
10/12/98 William J. Larson
10/12/98 Chris & Sheila King
10/12/98 Wayne Bishop
10/12/98 LnMcmullin@aol.com
10/12/98 dslomer
10/12/98 Jerry Uhl
10/13/98 Lou Talman
10/13/98 Lou Talman
10/14/98 Victor Levine
10/14/98 William J. Larson
10/14/98 dslomer
10/14/98 CalcPage@aol.com
10/15/98 William J. Larson
10/19/98 BDS McConnell
10/19/98 Albert Goetz