re:L****victor_meldrew_...@yahoo.co.uk: I like a fool misspelled "orthodox". While you share the same first name with my father I can only pray the reason the "666" is there because 2/3 didn't fit. Re: "Does that mean it's bogus?" ***You tell me: ***If you have feedback, I very much encourage, welcome, thank and appreciate. ***If anyone is attempting to disprove undecidability of P==NP please email me. On May 9, 2:46 am, "victor_meldrew_...@yahoo.co.uk" <victor_meldrew_...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On 9 May, 09:18, Martin Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > An informal and highly experimental, *unorthodox* proof > > Does that mean "bogus"?. No, you are welcome to try to disprove it. > > > P=NP has been > > published on CERN preprints. > >