Math Forum Discussions

Guest

Watch this User

Re: P=NP Proof Published at CERN
Posted: May 9, 2009 3:30 PM

Plain Text

On May 9, 6:00 am, A N Niel <ann...@nym.alias.net.invalid> wrote:
> In article
> <b36eb4ca-cbed-41b3-b369-4b0f559a1...@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
> Martin Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > An informal and highly experimental, unorthadox proof P=NP has been
> > published on CERN preprints.
>
> >http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1164206/files/s1-ln5758210-9223534-19396...
> > 1468147288IdV-15212827115758210PDF_HI0001.pdf
>
> > It is mine, and no it is not published anywhere else. My purpose in
> > posting it here is for feedback and suggestions on how to strengthen
> > it.
>
> > I would specifically, as was my intention with this experiment, like
> > feedback from anyone interested in the methodology I used and
> > suggestion as to how I might go about pursuing a more broadly accepted
> > peer-reviewed published proof building on this basic result.
>
> > Thank you,
>
> > Martin Musatov
> > m[dot]mm[at]vzw[dot]blackberry[dot]net.
>
> The mathematics formulas in that PDF are unintelligible. Was that done
> by you, or bungled by IMAJAM (or CERN) when it was put on-line?
Sorry for the report:
*A N Niel: the actual culprit believe it or not was Google docs
uploading a .txt file converting to .pdf which created the in and out
character/equations on the left side of the page. The vertical
numbering appeared when I attempted to upload a proof a manuscript
system. It looked very sturdy and well-enforced so I tried to throw it
up against the CERN server and see if it woulds stick and it did. I
then began to experiment with other "geometric" databases:
A first example of which can be found here:
*http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1164207/export/xm
note: no missing "L" there...
and:
*http://documents.cern.ch/photo/photo-tsic/icon-dfbx-2009-001.gif
a neat picture I used in developing my theory. My interests began in
geometry and then shifted into numerical analysis and prime numbers so
P==NP was my way to reconcile all of this. When I saw the error Google
Docs generated I began to wonder if we could define functions
pertaining to numerical analysis not by their presence but by their
absence, and more specifically the geometry of the space that makes up
that absence. After all as complicated as numbers can be we only have
10 plus a zero. In the end this was the shape, or an example of it in
binary to which I was able to parse two sets of data readable and
absent from one document:
********************************************************************************************
NOTE: The Google Docs parsing began generating content vertically as
it ran the equations I had prepared in a Microsoft Word file, then ctl
+c, ctl+v into .txt file. IT RAN RIGHT THROUGH THE REFERENCES BEFORE
SEALING OFF THE SOLUTION JUST THIS SIDE OF INFINITY it was pretty
neat:
*********************************************************************************************
So indeed my proof stands correct and I hope it makes its way over to
Mr. Cook for his comments;!
*********************************************************************************************
----------Here is a sample parsing from a "Polynomial Time
Algorithm"-------------------------
MARTIN M. MUSATOV: m[dot]mm[at]vzw[dot]blackberry[dot]net
An Open Address to Mr. Stephen A. Cook: sacook [at] cs [dot] toronto
[dot] edu
STATEMENT OF THE SOLUTION
This solution to P versus NP explains how every language accepted by
some non deterministic algorithm in polynomial time can be accepted by
some (deterministic) algorithm in polynomial time. To define the
solution it is formally it is necessary to observe the model of a
computer, or Turing machine and process information in real-time as it
is received as a computable function or linear stream.
By this declaration, formally, the class P contains the indecision
problems
P =
.
...
.
N.
...
.
P
From this point, we can continue the expansion:
The area of a circle [2]: . ..=....2
The binomial theorem [3]: ..+.. ..= ..
..
........-..
..
..=0
Expansion of a sum (Taylor Series) [4];.
1+.. ..=1+
....
1!
+
.. ..-1 ..22!
+.
Followed by the Fourier Series [5]:.
.. .. =..0+ ....cos
......
..
+....sin
......
..
8
..=1
The Pythagorean Formula [6]:. ..2+..2=..2
1 Arfken, G. "Special Coordinate Systems--Rectangular Cartesian
Coordinates." §2.3 in
Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 3rd ed. Orlando, FL: Academic
Press, pp. 94-95, 1985.
2 Richmond, Bettina (1999-01-12). "Area of a Circle". Western Kentucky
University.
Retrieved on 2007-11-04.
3Amulya Kumar Bag. Binomial Theorem in Ancient India. Indian J.History
Sci.,1:68-74,1966.
4 "Neither Newton nor Leibniz - The Pre-History of Calculus and
Celestial Mechanics in
Medieval Kerala". MAT 314. Canisius College. Retrieved on
2006-07-09.
5William E. Boyce and Richard C. DiPrima, Elementary Differential
Equations and Boundary
Value Problems, Eighth edition. John Wiley & Sons,
Inc., New Jersey, 2005. ISBN 0-471-43338-1
6Bell, John L., The Art of the Intelligible: An Elementary Survey of
Mathematics in its
Conceptual Development, Kluwer, 1999. ISBN 0-7923-5972-
0.
7Heaton, H. (1896) A Method of Solving Quadratic Equations, American
Mathematical
Monthly 3(10), 236-237.
Through the Quadratic Equation [7]:.
..=
-..± ..2-4....
2..
Page 2 of 3
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/imamat
Manuscripts submitted to (i)The IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics(/i)
To be succeed by a modified Taylor Series Expansion [8];.
....=1+
..
1!
+
..22!
+
..33!
+.,-8<..<8 ?
m [dot] mm [at] vzw [dot] blackberry [dot] net