On May 9, 6:00 am, A N Niel <ann...@nym.alias.net.invalid> wrote: > In article > <b36eb4ca-cbed-41b3-b369-4b0f559a1...@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, > > > > Martin Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > An informal and highly experimental, unorthadox proof P=NP has been > > published on CERN preprints. > > >http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1164206/files/s1-ln5758210-9223534-19396... > > 1468147288IdV-15212827115758210PDF_HI0001.pdf > > > It is mine, and no it is not published anywhere else. My purpose in > > posting it here is for feedback and suggestions on how to strengthen > > it. > > > I would specifically, as was my intention with this experiment, like > > feedback from anyone interested in the methodology I used and > > suggestion as to how I might go about pursuing a more broadly accepted > > peer-reviewed published proof building on this basic result. > > > Thank you, > > > Martin Musatov > > m[dot]mm[at]vzw[dot]blackberry[dot]net. > > The mathematics formulas in that PDF are unintelligible. Was that done > by you, or bungled by IMAJAM (or CERN) when it was put on-line? > > The mathematics formulas in that PDF are identical to as they were in parsing on p.3 of this document here. > http://member.thinkfree.com/myoffice/show.se?f=a2262e3b4f62ab0338f0d41fde4ffb82 The whole expansion on page 3. >Thank you, so much for your time attention and challenge: Martin Musatov m[dot]mm[at]vzw[dot]blackberry[dot]net.~~~~
