On Sat, 9 May 2009 14:19:50 -0700 (PDT), Martin Musatov <marty.musatov@gmail.com> wrote:
>On May 9, 12:15 pm, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez ><mariano.suarezalva...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 9 mayo, 05:18, Martin Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > An informal and highly experimental, unorthadox proof P=NP has been >> > published on CERN preprints. >> >> >http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1164206/files/s1-ln5758210-9223534-19396... >> >> > It is mine, and no it is not published anywhere else. My purpose in >> > posting it here is for feedback and suggestions on how to strengthen >> > it. >> >> > I would specifically, as was my intention with this experiment, like >> > feedback from anyone interested in the methodology I used and >> > suggestion as to how I might go about pursuing a more broadly accepted >> > peer-reviewed published proof building on this basic result. >> >> A two-page, literally unreadable text with nothing in it (at least >> that did not get mangled) even remotely similar to anything related to >> computational complexity theory is not something you can get feedback >> on. >> It is actually even impossible to see *what* it is you want feedback >> on. >> >> -- m > >do you have the time to help me>?9 12:15:13 -0700 (PDT) >Local: Sat, May 9 2009 12:15 pm
If you want help you have to make a readable copy of the proof available.
David C. Ullrich
"Understanding Godel isn't about following his formal proof. That would make a mockery of everything Godel was up to." (John Jones, "My talk about Godel to the post-grads." in sci.logic.)
