I do not know BURT or who Markov is. My name I, Martin Michael Musatov,> On May 10, 3:46 pm, Martin Musatov: I do not know how be more detailed or explicit. If there is something I am doing wrong correct it or tell me how I can correct it. If you cannot do this then simply accept my work as part of this body of work:> <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "Vagueness is the last refuge for ignorance. > Complexity is the last > > refuge for evil." > > > > > > > > Mariano Suárez-Alvarez wrote: > > > On 9 mayo, 05:18, Martin Musatov > <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > An informal and highly experimental, unorthadox > proof P=NP has been > > > > published on CERN preprints. > > > > > > >http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1164206/files/s1-ln57582 > 10-9223534-19396... > > > > > > It is mine, and no it is not published anywhere > else. My purpose in > > > > posting it here is for feedback and suggestions > on how to strengthen > > > > it. > > > > > > I would specifically, as was my intention with > this experiment, like > > > > feedback from anyone interested in the > methodology I used and > > > > suggestion as to how I might go about pursuing > a more broadly accepted > > > > peer-reviewed published proof building on this > basic result. > > > > > A two-page, literally unreadable text with > nothing in it (at least > > > that did not get mangled) even remotely similar > to anything related to > > > computational complexity theory is not something > you can get feedback > > > on. > > > It is actually even impossible to see *what* it > is you want feedback > > > on. > > > *What specifically is "unintelligible"? > > It does not even qualify as a text, let alone as > a coherent exposition of an heuristic which may or > may not resolve a mathematical problem. > > I simply cannot believe you are serious, for even > a minimally trained Markov chain will do a better job > both at coming up with English prose and at following > minimal usenet conventions in composing posts: even > BURT makes more sense and is more articulate than > you are, and you are less intruiguing than him too. > I trust you will not be particularly disrupted in > your > pursuits if I start ignoring you from now on, so I > will. > > Cheers, > > -- m >
