Answer me:> Denis wrote : > > > Martin Musatov a écrit : > > > An informal and highly experimental, unorthodox > > proof P=NP has been > > > published on CERN preprints. > > > > > > > > > http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1164206/files/s1-ln575821 > > > > 0-9223534-1939656818Hwf-1468147288IdV-1521282711575821 > > > 0PDF_HI0001.pdf > > > > > > It is mine, and no it is not published anywhere > > else. My purpose in > > > posting it here is for feedback and suggestions > on > > how to strengthen > > > it. > > > > > > I would specifically, as was my intention with > this > > experiment, like > > > feedback from anyone interested in the > methodology > > I used and > > > suggestion as to how I might go about pursuing a > > more broadly accepted > > > peer-reviewed published proof building on this > > basic result. > > > > > > Dont worry : if you have really proved P=NP, any > > working program solving > > any NP-complete problem in polynomial time will be > > enough to bring you > > fame, the Clay prize money, and perhaps even > > chicks... > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > Martin Musatov > > > m[dot]mm[at]vzw[dot]blackberry[dot]net. > > Fool ! > > its just another crank , the reference to CERN only > makes its sad. > > you wouldnt recognize a real crank , if he bites your > nose ! > > the P = NP proof is bogus !! > > i cant believe mentioning CERN is enough to trick you > ! > > you still amaze me , but in a bad way ! > > cmon , JSH does better than that ! > > i hope no money was spent on that piece of crap ... > > > no regards > > tommy1729
