On May 9, 2:17 pm, Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeo...@verizon.invalid> wrote: > Mariano Suárez-Alvarez wrote: > > A two-page, literally unreadable text with nothing in it (at least > > that did not get mangled) even remotely similar to anything related to > > computational complexity theory is not something you can get feedback > > on. > > It is actually even impossible to see *what* it is you want feedback > > on. > > I prefer to think of it as the middle 20 pages somehow got cut out, > since the geometry had to be somehow related to computational complexity... > > -- > Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not > tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
Well for starters why does the section of you complaining about my work and insulting me "magically" get replaced by a comment by Donald E. Knuth on this board would be a good first thing I would like feedback on. Why did this happen?