Math Forum Discussions

Guest

Watch this User

Re: P=NP Proof Published at CERN
Posted: May 11, 2009 5:13 AM

Plain Text

On May 10, 2:45 pm, Martin Michael Musatov <marty.musatov@gmail.com>
wrote:
> "[P==NP]:'It is the glory of God to conceal a matter; to search out a matter is the glory of kings.'25:2.__Martin Musatov:[m[dot]mm[at]vzw[dot]blackberry[dot]net.469-15-8334,818-430-4586, 9-23-1978.> On May 10, 3:46 pm, Martin Musatov
>
> > <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > "Vagueness is the last refuge for ignorance.
> > Complexity is the last
> > > refuge for evil."
>
> > > Mariano Suárez-Alvarez wrote:
> > > > On 9 mayo, 05:18, Martin Musatov
> > <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > An informal and highly experimental, unorthadox
> > proof P=NP has been
> > > > > published on CERN preprints.
>
> > >http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1164206/files/s1-ln57582
> > 10-9223534-19396...
>
> > > > > It is mine, and no it is not published anywhere
> > else. My purpose in
> > > > > posting it here is for feedback and suggestions
> > on how to strengthen
> > > > > it.
>
> > > > > I would specifically, as was my intention with
> > this experiment, like
> > > > > feedback from anyone interested in the
> > methodology I used and
> > > > > suggestion as to how I might go about pursuing
> > a more broadly accepted
> > > > > peer-reviewed published proof building on this
> > basic result.
>
> > > > A two-page, literally unreadable text with
> > nothing in it (at least
> > > > that did not get mangled) even remotely similar
> > to anything related to
> > > > computational complexity theory is not something
> > you can get feedback
> > > > on.
> > > > It is actually even impossible to see *what* it
> > is you want feedback
> > > > on.
>
> > > *What specifically is "unintelligible"?
>
> > It does not even qualify as a text, let alone as
> > a coherent exposition of an heuristic which may or
> > may not resolve a mathematical problem.
>
> > I simply cannot believe you are serious, for even
> > a minimally trained Markov chain will do a better job
> > both at coming up with English prose and at following
> > minimal usenet conventions in composing posts: even
> > BURT makes more sense and is more articulate than
> > you are, and you are less intriguing than him too.
> > I trust you will not be particularly disrupted in
> > your
> > pursuits if I start ignoring you from now on, so I
> > will.
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > -- m
>
>

I do not even know what a Markov model is. My last name is Musatov, my
dad is named Victor Musatov. He does not have a middle name because he
is Russian. I once bought a painting from a website. The painting was
called "Spring" by Victor Borisov-Musatov. I first read about the
artist here: http://www.abcgallery.com/B/borisov-musatov/borisov-musatov.html

Ironically my dad too has: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyphosis. But
his is from a condition called: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ankylosing_spondylitis.

I love him very much. I spent $100 getting that picture framed from
Michael's in Burbank, California. I believe the year was 2005. My
middle name is also Michael. Michael Schultz is my Godfather. He is
currently battling cancer and one of the key motivators in my proof
P=NP. He and my young niece who is hard of hearing. She is such an
angel. I want these advances in health care and compassion much more
than any cryptography. My ATM card is useless without the love of my
family. It does not matter how much money there is in my account.

Please note: I wrote the above as an experiment as now I am seeing
there are bounds or edges to complexity where only certain words and
messages appear at certain times and they depend on variables which I
do not fully but am starting to understand.--Martin Musatov