On May 10, 6:09 pm, Martin Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > victor_meldrew_...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > > On 9 May, 19:50, Martin Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Also here are some additional related results: 1) Access to > > > Photograph:http://documents.cern.ch/cgi-bin/setlink?base=PHO&categ=photo-tsic&id... > > > 2)Conversions Information: Portable Document Format:http:// > > > documents.cern.ch/archive/electronic/hep-lat/9612/9612008.pdf > > > Wgat have these to do with your drivel? > > > > > Does that mean "bogus"?. > > > > No, you are welcome to try to disprove it. > > > There is nothing there to disprove; it's "not even wrong". I agree with the proof. I cannot deny it by the evidence shown it solves several NP-complete problems referenced here: > > Does not even wrong mean right? If not what does it mean? If something is not wrong the assumption is someone is dancing around admitting it is right.--Martin Musatov
