On May 10, 10:40 pm, Martin Michael Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Answer me:> Denis wrote : > > > > > > > > Martin Musatov a écrit : > > > > An informal and highly experimental, unorthodox > > > proof P=NP has been > > > > published on CERN preprints. > > >http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1164206/files/s1-ln575821 > > > 0-9223534-1939656818Hwf-1468147288IdV-1521282711575821 > > > > 0PDF_HI0001.pdf > > > > > It is mine, and no it is not published anywhere > > > else. My purpose in > > > > posting it here is for feedback and suggestions > > on > > > how to strengthen > > > > it. > > > > > I would specifically, as was my intention with > > this > > > experiment, like > > > > feedback from anyone interested in the > > methodology > > > I used and > > > > suggestion as to how I might go about pursuing a > > > more broadly accepted > > > > peer-reviewed published proof building on this > > > basic result. > > > > Dont worry : if you have really proved P=NP, any > > > working program solving > > > any NP-complete problem in polynomial time will be > > > enough to bring you > > > fame, the Clay prize money, and perhaps even > > > chicks... > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > Martin Musatov > > > > m[dot]mm[at]vzw[dot]blackberry[dot]net. > > > Fool ! > > > its just another crank , the reference to CERN only > > makes its sad. > > > you wouldnt recognize a real crank , if he bites your > > nose ! > > > the P = NP proof is bogus !! > > > i cant believe mentioning CERN is enough to trick you > > ! > > > you still amaze me , but in a bad way ! > > > cmon , JSH does better than that ! > > > i hope no money was spent on that piece of crap ... > > > no regards > > > tommy1729 > > Who is "JSH"?--Martin Musatov You still have not answered my question. Who is JSH and why do you talk to me so poorly and with such anger?