On May 11, 5:14 am, Martin Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On May 10, 6:09 pm, Martin Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > victor_meldrew_...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > > > On 9 May, 19:50, Martin Musatov <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Also here are some additional related results: 1) Access to > > > > Photograph:http://documents.cern.ch/cgi-bin/setlink?base=PHO&categ=photo-tsic&id... > > > > 2)Conversions Information: Portable Document Format:http:// > > > > documents.cern.ch/archive/electronic/hep-lat/9612/9612008.pdf > > > > Wgat have these to do with your drivel? > > > > > > Does that mean "bogus"?. > > > > > No, you are welcome to try to disprove it. > > > > There is nothing there to disprove; it's "not even wrong". I agree with the proof. I cannot deny it by the evidence shown it solves several NP-complete problems referenced here: > > Does not even wrong mean right? If not what does it mean? If something > is not wrong the assumption is someone is dancing around admitting it > is right.--Martin Musatov
Hi, Martin:
No, it means that you have posted rambling, incoherent nonsense. It is not "even wrong" because only statements fall under the logical dichotomy of being true or false, and you write with no reasoned connection with the P vs. NP problem.
Hence your "proof" is not even wrong. You might as well have copied a poem about birds or the ingredients of a cake.
